The Dog that Refuses to Bark: A Stunning Clue about the Problem with American Media

worse than it looksYou probably have heard about the book from a little while back, It’s Even Worse Than It Looks. It was written by two very centrist, perhaps even conservative, interpreters of the Washington scene: Norm Ornstein (of the American Enterprise Institute) and Thomas Mann (of the Brookings Institution).

One of the main quotations from that book describes the Republican Party as

an insurgent outlier…ideologically extreme; contemptuous of the inherited social and economic policy regime; scornful of compromise; unpersuaded by conventional understanding of facts, evidence and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition.

When I heard first heard that passage, back in 2012, my thought was: it’s about time you noticed that. To me, that’s been blatantly, disturbingly obvious for years.

But here’s the kicker. When Ornstein and Mann came out with their book –belatedly in my view, as I said– they were subject to a kind of ostracism, a loss of their high media status. Here’s how Raw Story put it:

The authors of It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided With the New Politics of Extremism, who have found themselves ostracized by the Sunday morning shows where they had always previously been welcome…

As a long-time aficionado of the detective story, I know a potential case-breaking clue when I see it. (The image of “the dog that didn’t bark” comes from one of Sherlock Holmes’s cases, by the way.)

What does it mean that the media would shun the authors of a book that points to the obvious devolution of the Republican Party into something extreme, something that breaks the usual mold for a major American Party?

Does it show that the media are actively and willingly collaborating with this destructive force? Does it show that the media are intimidated by that force? Is there any other possible explanation besides those two?

(In the Sherlock Holmes story, “Silver Blaze,” the fact that the dog didn’t bark showed the the killer was someone with whom the dog had a friendly relationship.)

In any event, it is stunning. And it deserves to be placed on a plate in front of the media, like a pile of dog excrement, with a demand that they explain themselves.

* Note: In time, Ornstein and Mann did get an appearance on Chris Hayes’s show. Chris Hayes’s show, on MSNBC, is clearly a different color of horse from the MEET THE PRESS, and FACE THE NATION kinds of show.

Bookmark the permalink.

2 Comments

  1. Hmmm, I wasn’t aware of that. Are you going to draw a conclusion? Maybe Ornstein and Mann will go be with Dan Rather and Keith Obermann – I think they’re on some internet channel.

  2. Richard H. Randall

    I see your same article at Credo and I think other sites and there are plenty of responses. I have been to ill to write anything, but must say that you have identified one of the ways the corporate/extremist ultra conservative parites of the ‘new world order’ are attempting to dominate our lives.
    The models of the business world, focused on profits for the few, and a one-zero game, are NOT good models for this nation, or any other nation.
    We are reaching a serious crisis when a vicious minority can freeze up the government from doing its work. The Republican part has no interest at all in positive contributions for the greater good except that they pass the issue by the Heritage action mafioso first. Therefore we have but an ideology of greed and power stopping the work of the nation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *