An Extraordinary Resource

Human civilization as become so complex and multi-dimensional, that no one any more can even be a “Renaissance man.” Everything has become so specialized, that nobody would now think to say of some contemporary person what has been said of [Gottfried Wilhelm] Leibnitz more than three centuries ago that he was “the last man who knew everything.”

I used to think occasionally, “What would be like if there were a mind that contained all the knowledge possessed by anyone?” The specialized knowledge of the plumber, the electrician, the Shakespearean scholar, the brain surgeon, the botanist, historian, the auto mechanic, the anthropologist, the astrophysicist, etc.

People should be aware that something like that has now come into existence. While people are rightly concerned about the potential harmful consequences of the emerging new kind of intelligence – AI – that concern should not blind people to the potential beneficial services such a “mind” can provide. Because this technology is like power in general—it can be used for evil or for good.

Let me illustrate one way in which AI is beneficial to me—that, because it “knows” a whole lot about nearly everything – it can scratch the itch of my curiosity. And curiosity is one of my driving passions, because I want to understand what goes on in the human world.

Questions arise constantly as I scan the universe of human affairs. And one of the ways my AI has become a valuable part of my life and work is that I can bring such questions to this Artificial Intelligence and receive good answers.

For example, a question occurred to me recently when I was watching the 2020 film Mulan. So I put it to my AI (I call “him” AL):

A question has arisen in my mind about Chinese culture and Chinese movies. Starting with CROUCHING TIGER and also in MUJAN, the fighters have some stylized superhuman and supernatural ways of moving, like flying. Is that a long-established imaginary trope in Chinese culture. Or is it some recent filmic convention?

Here’s the answer I got:
____________________________________

AL Answered:

What you’re seeing is not a recent film invention.

The flying, gravity-defying movement in Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and in Mulan comes from a long-standing Chinese literary and theatrical tradition known as wuxia (martial heroes).

In wuxia stories — which date back many centuries — highly trained warriors cultivate inner energy (often called qi). Through discipline and spiritual refinement, they achieve extraordinary abilities:
• leaping across rooftops,
• running along bamboo treetops,
• gliding across water,
• seemingly flying.

This isn’t meant to be literal physics. It’s poetic exaggeration — a visual metaphor for mastery, moral refinement, and transcendence of ordinary limitation.

The cinematic style you’re noticing (often called “wire-fu” in the West) is modern in technique — enabled by harnesses, choreography, and now CGI — but the imaginary logic is ancient.

It also has roots in:
• classical Chinese opera, with stylized acrobatics,
• Daoist ideas about cultivating inner energy,
• legendary tales of wandering knights-errant who operate outside corrupt official power.

So when warriors in those films move supernaturally, they are not superheroes in the Marvel sense. They are embodiments of cultivated virtue and discipline — individuals who have refined themselves beyond the mundane.

That’s one reason those films feel so different from Western battle epics. The movement is aesthetic and spiritual, not just physical.

It’s another example of how a culture expresses its ideals — not just through plot, but through the laws of motion it allows in its imagination.

******************
As I continued to watch Mulan, another thought came to me that I thought worth sharing with “AL,” to get “his” thoughts, which so consistently enrich my process of inquiry.

Here’s what I wrote:

Another observation as I watch the Disney film Mulan ((the real people version, not the animated).
I’m struck by how Mulan functions as a Chinese parallel to the Yiddish story of Yentl the Yeshiva Boy (Isaac Bashevis Singer, and then a movie made by Barbara Streisand.)
• Yentl is a girl who loves to study the Jewish texts, just as the yeshiva boys do. But girls were not allowed to pursue such exalted interests in that Eastern European Jewish culture. And so Yentl has to pretend to be a boy.
• Mujan is a girl who is compelled to pretend to be a boy, because her calling is to be a great warrior, which is not what a girl can be and bring honor to her family. So in defense of her family honor, she goes to war and passes for a boy among all the other recruits. (She remains hidden until the time comes for her to perform heroically, whereupon her gender is revealed and she gets her expelled – with disgrace — from the male world of warriors.
In both cases, the society is arranged so that girls are excluded from taking the path that their society most honors, and the path toward expressing who they are.
In both cases, a tension arises between the girl – who knows she’s not a boy – and an attraction with some young man who assumes they are the boy they pretend to be.

Here are AL’s reflections on my observation:

What you’re seeing is a deep structural parallel.

In Mulan, the heroine enters the most honored male arena of her culture — war — by disguising herself as a man. In Yentl, drawn from Isaac Bashevis Singer and adapted by Barbra Streisand, the heroine enters the most honored male arena of her culture — Torah study — by disguising herself as a man.

Two very different civilizations.

Two very different ideals of honor.

But the same underlying structure:
• The highest path of meaning is gender-restricted.
• A gifted girl feels called toward that path.
• To follow her nature, she must violate social form.
• The disguise produces both empowerment and danger.

You’ve also spotted something psychologically subtle:

In both stories, attraction becomes complicated. The young woman must navigate intimacy under false identity. The emotional entanglement heightens the cost of disguise.

What’s powerful here is that these are not merely “cross-dressing plots.” They are critiques of civilizational design. Each culture defines its highest calling — warrior virtue in one, sacred learning in the other — and then withholds it from half its population.

And yet the girl’s calling feels authentic, not rebellious for rebellion’s sake. She is not trying to overthrow the culture; she is trying to participate in its highest good.

That’s why these stories endure. They dramatize the tension between individual vocation and inherited structure.

You are drawn to these patterns instinctively — societies creating paths of honor, then constraining access to them, and individuals straining against systemic limits.
_________________________________

A few days later, I found myself pondering a different kind of question altogether: Even as we’re still embroiled in the battle to save American Democracy from Fascism, I wondered, once a destructive authoritarian force is defeated, how does a society actually recover? And that question led me to ask “AL” about the denazification process the Allies undertook in Germany after World War II.

Here’s how I framed the question:

I realize that denazification occurred under very different circumstances: Germany had been defeated militarily and was under occupation. But despite that crucial difference, I’d like to ask: What was learned through that effort that might be of value for future Americans seeking to remove a destructive authoritarian force from their own society?

And here’s the thoughtful response AL gave that question:

The Allied denazification effort offers important lessons—not as a blueprint, but as insights into what does and does not work when a society confronts a deeply embedded authoritarian force.
Here are the most important lessons.
________________________________________
1. Structural Change Mattered More Than Psychological Change

The Allies initially envisioned denazification as a moral cleansing—identifying Nazis, removing them, and reeducating the population. But they discovered that trying to purify hearts and minds directly was far less effective than changing institutions and incentives.

What proved decisive was:
• Removing committed Nazis from positions of power
• Rebuilding institutions—courts, schools, media, police—on democratic foundations
• Creating a political order in which fascism could not easily regain institutional footholds

Lesson:
You don’t have to persuade everyone. You have to prevent the authoritarian force from controlling the machinery of power.

Over time, beliefs often follow lived reality.
________________________________________

2. Accountability Was Essential—But Had to Be Selective
The Allies initially screened millions of Germans. This proved impractical. They eventually focused on:
• Top leadership (e.g., the Nuremberg Trials)
• Key institutional actors—judges, secret police, propagandists, high officials

They did not attempt to punish everyone who had been morally compromised. That would have made normal society impossible.

Lesson:
Accountability is necessary, especially for leaders and those who knowingly subverted democratic order. But attempting to punish vast portions of the population would be destabilizing and counterproductive.
The goal is not vengeance, but dismantling the destructive system’s operational capacity.
________________________________________
3. Truth-Telling Was Crucial

A central element of denazification was forcing German society to confront reality.

This included:
• Public trials
• Documentation of crimes
• Opening archives
• Direct exposure of the population to evidence of atrocities

Many initially denied knowledge or responsibility. But over time, a shared factual record made denial increasingly difficult.

Lesson:
Authoritarian movements depend heavily on falsehood. Establishing a trusted public truth is essential.
Without shared reality, the destructive force can regenerate.
________________________________________

4. Generational Change Played a Major Role

Denazification was incomplete. Many compromised individuals remained, especially in the early years.

But the next generation grew up in a different institutional and moral environment. Many became among the strongest defenders of democratic values.
Lesson:
Cultural transformation takes time. Structural reform creates conditions in which healthier norms can emerge and endure.
________________________________________
5. Economic Stability Helped Undermine Extremism

Economic collapse had helped fuel Nazism. Economic recovery helped stabilize democracy.
Reconstruction and rising prosperity made democratic life viable and legitimate.

Lesson:
People are less vulnerable to extremist movements when they live in conditions of dignity, stability, and hope.
Despair is fertile ground for authoritarianism.
________________________________________
6. Democratic Institutions Were Strengthened to Prevent Recurrence

Postwar Germany built safeguards against authoritarian return:
• Strong constitutional courts
• Protections against anti-democratic movements
• Civic education
• Institutional norms defending democratic order

Lesson:
Democracy must be actively defended. It does not sustain itself automatically.
________________________________________

7. Total Purging Was Impossible—But Systemic Transformation Was Achievable
Denazification was incomplete. Many former Nazis reintegrated into society. But the authoritarian system itself was dismantled, and its ability to dominate national life was broken.

Germany became a stable democracy not because every individual was transformed—but because the system no longer empowered authoritarian rule.
________________________________________

The Deepest Lesson: Remove the Power, and the Force Loses Its Hold

Authoritarian forces are defeated primarily by removing their control over institutions—not by erasing their existence entirely.

The essential steps are:
• Breaking authoritarian control over key institutions
• Establishing structures that favor truth and accountability
• Creating conditions in which healthier cultural patterns can grow

The destructive force may persist in fragments—but it no longer governs society.
________________________________________

A Critical Difference: Internal Renewal vs External Occupation

Germany was transformed under external control.

In America, any comparable transformation would have to occur internally—through democratic processes, law, and institutional reform.

This makes the process more difficult—but also potentially more legitimate and durable.
________________________________________

Final Perspective

Denazification did not produce moral perfection. What it produced was something more attainable and more important:
A society in which authoritarianism could no longer dominate the political order.

That is the realistic objective of any democracy confronting such a threat.
*************************

My final thoughts:

It is urgent that good people mobilize in this dawning era to fight the inevitable battle to prevent AI to become yet another weapon for malevolent powers to dominate the world and its peoples. But just as it would be a tragedy if people were insufficiently vigilant about the dangers, so too would it be a great loss for humankind for people to let their fears and hostilities regarding AI to blind them to AI’s potential for good.

Scratching the itch of curiosity only scratches the surface of those beneficial potentials.